![]() ![]() ![]() The loft on the Ping i500 is 30.5 degrees while that of the Blueprint is 34.0 degrees. It’s a fact that a longer club can provide more distance, but this seems like a slight difference so you need to make up your mind on that. Looking at the 7-iron clubs, the Blueprint has a length of 36 3/4″ against the 37″ length of the i500. Therefore, if you’re trying to keep versatility intact on all your shots, the Blueprint may give you a slight advantage over the i500. However, the sole is narrower in the Blueprint than the i500.Ī narrower sole means you can get cleaner turf interaction, which translates to more consistent strikes from different lies and turf conditions. Just like the face, both clubs have almost unidentifiable semblance here too. That makes it more beautiful (perhaps than the all-chrome finish of the Blueprint). The i500 club has a tiny curvature at the neck while the Blueprint is parallel from the neck down to the face.Īlso, the face of the i500 is marked off by a black that divides the chrome finish. However, a tiny difference is found towards the neck of the clubs. Well, both are equally similar as they both come with precision-milled grooves and face to ensure ball speeds are consistent when you heat. Whichever, your game shouldn’t be disturbed. But what’s the benefit of this premium finish? Well, it’s great for repelling moisture and ensuring solid impact when you need to play during the wet seasons. That means there is no difference here at all. Both balls have the hydropearl chrome 2.0 finish. The manufacturer certainly has you covered. ![]() If you’re a fan of beautifully designed irons, you’ll be concerned with the finishing on both irons. However, if your game needs lots of forgiveness or needs something to bring out the confidence in you, then go for the Blueprint. So, if you’re after power, distance, and more speed, you should check out the i500. The Blueprint is therefore design for high workability and better trajectory control while the i500 is steered towards incredible distance, high speed, and impressive stopping power. The i500 has a forged C300 maraging-steel face with a metalwood-like construction as opposed to the tour-inspired 8620 carbon steel, blade-style design of the Ping Blueprint. Designīoth the Blueprint and i500 have a clean, portable design with less offset and a shorter blade length for an increase in workability. The i500 has a forged face too and a hollow design. The i500, on the other hand, has a traditional look at address and is certainly built for more forgiveness and speed. The Blueprint is a classic iron in both shape and pure forged face. Ping Blueprint vs i500: Are They Similar? 2 Final Thoughts on the Blueprint & i500.1 Ping Blueprint vs i500: Are They Similar?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |